Friday, June 28, 2013

Who Needs Theology?



Theology: Roadmap for Relationship

(Photo Credit: S.M.R.)


Some might ask, “If Christianity is a relationship with God, what is the point of spending so much time with theology and doctrine? Why not just get on with it?” C.S. Lewis describes theology as a map.[i] If one is to “get on with it (living life),” then a map describes precisely how one can “get on with it.” The map is not the “getting on with it,” and does not replace the “getting on,” but is merely some directions and frames of reference to do so. To go without a map is to get lost. And I dare say, many modern Christians— having at first located the starting point of confessing Christ and being baptized— have since become lost. Lost to a deeper knowledge of God; lost to why they were created in the first place; lost in how to truly relate to an infinite God; lost to how God designed marriage. Some are a bit confused as to the meaning of their God designed gender. The map of theology helps with all of this. Keep in mind that the relationship we are talking about is the relationship between an immutable, eternal, infinite, holy God and finite created Man. For this relationship to work there must be some major protocols in place. For Man, it would behoove him to “follow the directions” for this relationship and not just “wing it.”   
Take for example the doctrine of the Fall of Man: it simply declares that there is something very wrong with the human race in his current state. For that reason, formation has always been a major task for the Church: when a believer has become acceptable to God legally— through the shed blood of Christ— they must further become acceptable to God in their manner of life. Theology and this book are about formation, taking that journey from where you are into what God wants you to be. All of this is accomplished under the premise of first having a right relationship with God as is spelled out in soteriology, a division of theology.  
Think of a young boy who has been out playing in the mud. Coming into the house, he is vaguely, but truly, recognized as the young man who lives there. Being fully accepted as a family member, this is where he truly belongs, but he is in no condition to come to the dinner table. He must be scrubbed, scoured, and redressed to be acceptable at the table. Proper relationship with all other home members requires this: do not come to the feast covered in mud. The Christian view of life on earth is that the believer is being cleaned up and prepared for that eternal dinner where the Lord sits with His people. This life is a time to lay up treasure in heaven by doing good deeds through God’s Grace. Theology assists with this. It is not just information, but it is how to make oneself respectable in God’s eyes, to please Him and be therefore presentable to all.
For the unregenerate, he has no relationship with the Owner of the house and cannot enter unless he is made acceptable through the shed blood of Christ so He can be adopted into God’s family. This only gives him the right and the ability through God’s Spirit to cry “Abba Father.” (Romans 8:15). But for the believer, life is a preparation for eternity, and a road map to this end is helpful indeed.
To have relationship with God is to understand what He has revealed about Himself, what He has revealed about Man, and how all the universe— with its angels and demons— is a part of the big picture. God wants us to know what is going on with His grand schema for everything. This is where theology comes in. It guides us and explains a lot of things. It shows that we have a great future— now and in eternity—  to which we look forward. God does not want us to be ignorant passengers on a train to who-knows-where, but His idea is passengers glued to the windows, absorbing every view on the way. Theology does that. It speaks of where we have been, where we are going, and how we are to get there.


[i] C. S. Lewis, Mere Christianity, (New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1943), p. 136.

The Family Album

"The Orphan Church" book quote:

(Photo Credit: S.M.R.)


Going to church, where I go to church (Orthodox), constitutes worship within the context of an old fashion family reunion. Some family members just have to be kissed and honored because in honoring them we honor God and the family of faith as a whole and that honor reflects back on us because we are honored to be in the same family. Not only do we regard our spiritual ancestors, we cover the walls with their special pictures lest we forget that we are not alone when we come to stand before the Lord Most High. We stand before God as the family, not as a group of individuals. Over there is St. Anthony, and over there is the Virgin Mary. And some angels are hanging around as well. Not only do we believe they surround us—they are present— in the great cloud of witnesses (Hebrews 12:1), we remind ourselves of the meaning their lives communicate to us. In some manner they reveal God to us. No, we do not worship the saints, we worship WITH the saints and we worship AS the saints (as one). We pay our spiritual ancestry the same respect any sane person would be expected to pay his most upright earthly father and mother.

Why are moderns so disrespectful to their parents? Why are so many of the redeemed expressing a lost-ness in their “personal” salvation? Why are so many who are attending church feeling so disconnected? Why are so many walking around as orphans? Perhaps it is because somebody hid the family album and the family story tellers have gone silent and everything has become mono-generational.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Everything God Does



It Is All About Relationship
(An excerpt from the book The Ikon of God)
This is  central to understanding everything that God does: it is all about relationship. God created everything because He wanted a community larger than Three. This is why everything in the cosmos has meaning. This understanding provides the proper lens to view everything: the Garden of Eden was a venue for relationship; the Fall was a breach of relationship, not just breaking a commandment. Every law God ever gave was for the purposes of preserving relationship; God never gave any law just purely for law’s sake. Think of all of the Old Testament rituals: it defined how people were to properly relate to God. Think about the Ten Commandments, they all define how relationships are to work.
Because everything God does is motivated by relationship, everything in Scripture is relational in nature: it is all about how created Man is to have relationship with the unlimited, uncreated God. This obviously requires protocols on how this relationship is to function. Think of it like this: God’s presence is the very Life that is to animate Man. To misjudge God’s heart toward Man is to miss the meaning of everything. God’s Word is not to be read like the periodic table, but as protocol for relationship.  
All of the parables the Jesus spoke revolved around relationship: a man’s relationship to God and other men. Consider the fatted calf in the parable of the “Prodigal Son.” It speaks (a sign) of Christ, not so much in His role in the mitigation for sin, but as a package of benefits that serve as a catalyst for fellowship. Most humans misunderstand the Father’s predisposition for a party. To God, the prodigal-ness of humanity is only a prelude to the big dance! And nobody can dance with themselves; a partner is required. In a variation of “Dances with Wolves,”[i] an easy three word definition of the meaning of the universe could be well stated as “Dances with God.”
Judgment is not God’s heart but God’s necessity. Judgment serves to preserve relationship, because it punishes and eradicates relational dysfunction at every turn. Many— even believers—, see God as being all about judgment. Yes, God does have and God does employ judgment. But we must understand the purpose of judgment. God’s judgment preserves and sanctifies relationship. Here is an example: if a man commits adultery, his wife is crushed. God gave Man the commandment not to commit adultery. Why? Because to commit adultery is to desecrate the marriage relationship and wreak unimaginable devastation on spouses.  
Keep this in mind when reading the Bible, engaging in worship, or reading this book.  


[i] 1990 western movie starring Kevin Costner, about an isolated solder who develops a relationship with the native people and a wolf and is named “Dances with Wolves” by the native people.

Monday, June 10, 2013

He Speaks-



Language of the Holy Spirit: Signs
(An excerpt from the book The Ikon of God)
One key to understanding Scripture is to know the language of the Holy Spirit. St. Augustine (AD 354-430), a bishop in Northern Africa, taught that the interpretation of Scripture as a process of dividing its elements into “things” and “signs.”
For a sign is a thing which, over and above the impression it makes on the senses, causes something else to come into the mind as a consequence of itself: as when we see a footprint, we conclude that an animal whose footprint this is has passed by; and when we see smoke, we know there is fire beneath; and when we hear the voice of a living man, we think of the feeling in his mind; and when the trumpet sounds, soldiers know that they are to advance or retreat, or do whatever else the state of the battle requires.[i]
“Signs” are references in Scripture that point to something else by having a different (and higher) dimension of meaning than just what is indicated on the surface, e.g. footprints tell us that an animal has left them. “Things” are items in Scripture that are to be taken at face value.[ii] Properly interpreting

Scripture can be described as reading the “signs” employed by the Holy Spirit. It is that simple. Reading Scripture is not like reading the periodic table: it is more than numbers and values. It is about many voices of meaning; it is the metanarrative of God’s dream. It is important to understand this presupposition because we will be interpreting signs— the meaning of figures and types— in this study on Man and his relationship to God. Reading Scripture is a treasure hunt!
Augustine goes on to say:
For among men words have obtained far and away the chief place as a means of indicating the thought of the mind. Our Lord, it is true, gave a sign through the odor of the ointment which was poured upon His feet; and in the sacrament of His body and blood He signified His will through the sense of taste; and when by touching the hem of His garment the woman was made whole, the act was not wanting in significance. But the countless multitude of the signs through which men express their thoughts consist of words. For I have been able to put into words all of these signs, the various classes of which I have briefly touched upon, but I could by no effort express words of those signs.[iii]
Think about what Augustine is saying: that all words are signs because they point to a meaning. All communication is based on signs (words) that have meaning. Take for example the word “dog.” The word “dog” is not the dog itself, but it points the individual toward the actual object. The word “dog” is a sign that points us to the object (the golden retriever chewing on your rug). Hence, communication is  inherently a signed based action, and without  signs, communication would be impossible. Scripture takes this same principle a level further: that objects in Scripture have more meaning that what is suggested at face value.
Jesus refers to Himself as the “Good Shepherd.” (John 10) Was Jesus talking about His occupational skills related to getting a job looking after somebody’s livestock? No, He was speaking about how He relates to His followers. “Good Shepherd” is a word picture to communicate something very meaningful about Himself. Jesus could have spent a lot of time explaining how you can trust Him with your life , but the picture communicates clearly what He is saying, particularly to an agricultural people. Entire books have been written expounding the depth of meaning to the believer regarding the Good Shepherd as we know Him.    
Another way to describe Augustine’s thinking about signs is to see that Scripture is laden with symbolism, or hidden messages and meaning. The Holy Spirit speaks, very often, through symbols that go beyond the words employed. If you are familiar with liturgical worship, you know it is more meaningful when you understand what all of the items and actions are saying. Understanding both Scripture and Liturgy involves the proper handling and understanding of the symbolism or signs employed.  
Symbols (signs) provide word pictures for the believer’s understanding, but the symbols employed can have multiple meanings. This makes it possible for Scripture to have so much meaning in a short volume: no other book on earth works like this. 
Let us consider Christianity’s most basic symbol, the cross. It is the faith’s universal sign, symbol, and even motif. But, what does the cross mean? It means many things that are all related to Christ, His passion, and the Church. From a theological point of view, among other things, the cross means that a price was paid so that my sins could be remitted and not counted against me in my relationship with God. From a devotional point of view, one may wear a cross or bow before a cross as an act of devotion to Christ. From a personal point of view, we can see the cross as referring to a lifestyle. After all, Jesus said we are to take up our own cross and follow Him. Here the meaning becomes even more personal: it suggests something about my own actions and attitudes. No symbol has received such universal proliferation throughout human history.
Very few things speak so much about the Christian faith, but to the common Roman soldier of Jesus day, the cross was an instrument of execution, the ultimate humiliation, and a demonstration of Roman supremacy. To him, all crosses upon which criminals hung were the same; there was no other meaning for him. For the believer, the cross upon which Christ hung is the epicenter of meaning. It is humanity’s only ticket to freedom out of bondage and into regeneration, into right relationship with God.
Symbols are like love letters passing through the mail system to be opened by certain people, obscured from public view. They are like arrows passing through time and space, landing on their intended targets, bringing tremendous import to the heart. This is how God speaks: the Holy Spirit works in conjunction with signs in communicating Grace to His people.   
This phenomenon of many (more than one) but related meanings is also evident in other symbols: water is a symbol of Life (God’s presence) as in, “He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water” (John 7:38-39), but it also symbolizes death, as in, “Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?” (Romans 6:3) The symbolism of water in Scripture is both life and death, and— in each case— the context makes it obvious as to which is the correct interpretation for that passage. But as we mentioned, both interpretations of the sign, “water,” have to be connected, and they are: Christian life is all about Life out of death or, we could say, Life that passes through death (which we call resurrection Life). The Life God gives to the believer is resurrection life, life that endures death to live again. Being filled with God’s life is about “dying daily.” While we are always living out the death of Christ by self-sacrifice, we are being filled with Life, God’s Life. 
There is another way in which the sign of water is used in Scripture, but, in this case, it is set opposed to fire. Both water and fire are used to refer to purification or cleansing.
But who may abide the day of his coming? And who shall stand when he appeareth? For he is like a refiner's fire, and like fullers' soap: and he shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver: and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and purge them as gold and silver, that they may offer unto the LORD an offering in righteousness. (Malachi 3:2-3)
In this one verse, the Spirit of God is speaking of how God will purify His people. Two analogies are employed:  that of fire (as it relates to purifying silver), and fullers’ soap (which— with water— cleans many things). Before, we mentioned how water refers to either life or death, but here it refers to cleaning and purifying, and it is coupled with fire which cleanses things in a different way: by burning up the undesirable elements in silver and gold. Searching other places in Scripture, we see two different ways in which God purifies His people. First is water, as in:
Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost. (Titus 3:5)
Many theologians believe this points to baptism. Washing speaks of cleansing, and regeneration speaks of rejuvenating with Life: both are meanings of water.
The Bible also refers to a cleansing experience in the believer’s life that is brought about by fire:
That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ. (1 Peter 1:7, emphasis added)
Fire here speaks of a purifying effect in the believer’s life, but it should never be confused with the eternal fire that the unregenerate will suffer in for eternity.  So, the sign “fire” also has multiple uses.
By using signs to communicate multiple meanings, the whole of Scripture is packed full of significance and expanded meaning.  The sign always implies the natural understanding of a thing, like fire or water, as a spiritual application: this is how signs work. Things of a physical nature point out and describe spiritual Truths.
The Holy Spirit’s usage of signs in Scripture shows us that Truth is very often parallel: water speaks of life because it is, in fact, the essence of all created earthly life (plant, animal, or human). It is irreplaceable. The truth of water being essential to all of life is parallel to the fact that God’s Life giving power (His living water) is also essential to our spiritual life and relationship with Him. Water in Scripture is also used for the cleansing that a spiritual Truth provides for us (as every housewife knows how essential water is to house cleaning). For this reason, God’s use of signs shows us that Truth is parallel.  
Another example of a sign used in Scripture (that is distinctly present in Creation) is that of gender. Reading what the Bible has to say about gender, we immediately see God created Man male and female; this would be what St. Augustine called a “sign,” something that has much greater importance than just the mechanisms of procreation. We would miss something divine, something wonderful, and something foundational if we just take gender at “face value.” Divine and eternal Truths are impressed into God’s image, Man, through gender. We will go into this in great detail later.
If we do not grasp these principles as they relate to signs, much of Scripture will be closed to us, locked up in types and shadows. Understanding this shows us that all of God’s workings can be described as three-dimensional in nature; by using word pictures, God  gives us a fuller understanding of what He is saying. By using signs, His intention is to create a desire within us to seek out the things of God. This use of signs also hides things from the unregenerate; knowing of God’s communications would create abuses by those who are against God and make their sin against God even more egregious. Signs (as well as parables) serve as a form of encryption of what God gives to His people and withholds from the unregenerate (Matthew 13:11). 
However, even though God communicates through multi-dimensional signs, our human comprehension, for the most part, only works in one-dimensional concepts; therefore we have to break it down into bites of information that make it chewable and digestible to us. Even though we are limited in this fashion, God’s desire is that we have a broad understanding of His ways: 
That Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith; that ye, being rooted and grounded in love, may be able to comprehend with all saints what is the breadth, and length, and depth, and height; and to know the love of Christ, which passeth knowledge, that ye might be filled with all the fulness of God. (Ephesians 3:17-19)
When gazing into the things of God, we must not limit our observation to our linear thinking but behold the wonder there is in a manifold revelation of Christ in all His glory. As we go through this study, we will be identifying signs (as St. Augustine explained) in Scripture. These signs serve as word-pictures to communicate God’s realities to us.


[i] Saint Augustine, On Christian Doctrine, trans. J. F. Shaw, (Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 2009), p. 32.
[ii] Ibid., p. 2.
[iii] Ibid., p. 33.

First Things First-



Authority From Which We Speak

(An excerpt from The Ikon of God)
The first and most basic element any reader would want to examine when reading  non-fiction is authority: how does the reader know that what the writer is saying is true? What does the author base his information on? Essentially, how do you know that you can trust us and what we say? Primarily, our authority starts and ends with the Bible. The first and foremost presupposition is that the Bible is understood to be the inspired, infallible Word of God that does not err. Even if the student does not have all of the theological nuances of what that means, he or she must understand that we are using the Bible as the authority for the way we should think about, implement, and live out a core understanding of Man and his relationship to God. Simply stated, it is through the Bible that we are able to peer beyond the veil of human limitation into God’s wondrous plans. Answers to all of the major questions of life are found in the Bible.
While mainly referring to Scripture as our guide for our study, we also will be referring to theological commentators from a broad spectrum of the Church. Interpretations will be quoted from some relatively new Christian authors and some very ancient writers, theologians, and Church Fathers. The wealth and volume of revelation contained in Christendom is immense and it spans many generations and comes from Christians of all walks of life.  
Our study can be described as your grandmother’s stew. Many things go into that stew, both vegetables and meat. The flavors of potatoes, carrots, beef, and many seasonings, all intermingle when cooked over time.. Here, you will find the Protestant with the Roman Catholic and the Presbyterian and the Charismatic, the new with the old. We will not be camping out in a particular denominational perspective but will be taking from a broad treasure and throwing it into one pot, simmering it until the common flavor exudes from every morsel. Like when the potatoes take on the flavor of the meat and carrots, we see a unity across the division as when we realize how various thoughts settle together from various branches of Christendom.
This melting pot of sources will, as we said, include some of the Church Fathers (by consulting the Church Fathers on matters of biblical interpretation, we are using the  lens of tradition). Many people today would ask why we consult the Church Fathers on Bible interpretation. How could they be relevant in obtaining a deeper understanding of the Scripture? There are two reasons: one, they were closer to the time of Christ and the first apostles. This makes their commentaries more reliable because we are always reforming and referring back to what God had established at the beginning. And two, they express a common thought for the entire, complete, and unified Church. It is hard for us today to think of the Body of Christ in any state other than its current condition with all of its denominations and non-denominations. The modern Church is highly fractured, but this has not always been. The Church developing out of its roots in Jerusalem was one in thought and mission. For 1,000 years (think about that) the Church was, very much a united body. The first major division did not occur until AD 1054 when the Catholic (western) and Orthodox (eastern) churches split. And even then, for another 500 years, the Church was only split in two. With the emergence of the Protestant Reformation in the sixteenth century, a fracturing process began to shape Protestant churches, first with the establishment of multiple denominations and— in recent times— a further splintering with the establishment into the “non-denominational/independent church,” each having a customized form of outside oversight or none at all. Modern writings no longer represent the stance of a unified whole, as the writings of the Church Fathers did. We certainly do not consider what the Church Fathers wrote to be of equal authority as the Scripture, but looking back at the Church and its writings in its pre-divided state brings a more accurate interpretation of the biblical authors for the very reason that the Church was completely unified and these men were closer to the Apostles (some, such as Clement of Rome, had even conversed directly with and learned personally from them).
Saint Vincent of LĂ©rins (5th century Christian writer) articulates why we need the lens of tradition when interpreting Scripture:
If someone wants to be protected from tricks and remain healthy in the faith, he must confine his faith first to the authority of the Holy Scriptures, and secondly to the Tradition of the Church. But someone may ask, is not the canon of Scripture sufficient for everything, and why should we add thereto the authority of Tradition? This is because not everyone understands the Scriptures in the same way, but one explains them this way and another that way, so that it is possible to get there from as many thoughts as there are heads. Therefore it is necessary to be guided by the understanding of the Church ... What is tradition? It is that which has been understood by everyone, everywhere and at all times ... that which you have received, and not that which you have thought up ... So then, our job is not to lead religion where we wish it to go, but to follow it where it leads, and not to give that which is our own to our heirs, but to guard that which has been given to us.[i]  
Basically, we are not saying much that new in this volume. We disclose things already discovered and they can be found in other writers throughout church history. We only hope for a pulling together into one location from across a broad history in order to obtain a better understanding of things already known and understood.
As with the astronauts of Apollo 8, discussed in the “Introduction,” Man needs outside perspective. It is not within Man to discover his origins or the origins of the universe on his own. He needs outside help. He needs God’s help. God provides that help through the Church (as well as the Holy Spirit); without the historical perspective of the Church, most readers succumb to their own private interpretation (2 Peter 2:20), formulating errors.


[i] Deacon George Maksimov, “Three-Hundred Sayings of the Ascetics of the Orthodox Church,” Orthodox Missionary Society
of Venerable Serapion Kozheozersky, 01-18-2013, http://orthodox.cn/patristics/300sayings_en.htm.

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

A Sign of the Times



Sustainability
 
(an excerpt from the book The Orphan Church)
by Bryan Raile
And in the morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowring. O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times?  (Matthew 16:3, emphasis added)
Jesus denounced those of His generation because they could not discern the signs of the times.” What did He mean by “signs of the times?” A sign is a form of communication; it says something about the brief moment in which we live. It reveals the truth or the reality of the events we are experiencing. Jesus endorsed the idea of reading signs that have specific meaning to a particular people or generation. The signs are speaking. Do you see them?

My wonderful wife pointed out some interesting facts: she can read the signs of the times. During the 1990’s, the church we attended was leading a global prayer effort. Some of you may have heard of it. It was called “Prayer Through the Window.” It referred to a concerted effort to pray for the nations in Africa and Asia that are in the 10/40 window (the nations between the 10th and 40th parallels). The movement reached all over the world, stimulating millions of believers to pray for these nations who— for the most part— exist under the bondage of Islam. The movement discontinued in the year 2000. During the 1990’s, the buzz word coming out of the culture was “global.” It was everywhere; everything was going “global.” Major businesses went “global,” economics went global, currency went global, the internet went global, and on and on. The message echoing through American culture during that decade was “globalization.” It seemed ironic that the culture or the society at large, inadvertently, projected something of what God was saying to Christianity, particularly our group who had set out on a mission to pray for the darkest nations on earth to hear and receive the Gospel. 

This begs the question:  what are the signs of these times right now? Can we read them, or will we be as ignorant as the people of Jesus day? 

Scanning the horizon, we can actually see two signs of the times that may be speaking through society to God’s people. One sign slaps you in the face every time you read the newspaper or view the news online, and another is relatively new and has only been flashing its message for a few short years. The first message is focused on gender. Everywhere you go the discussion of the day—the issues being tried in courts, the decisions being made regarding public schools and universities— are regarding gender. When the culture at large is dealing with an issue, it is a sure sign that God is pressing His Church to search the Scripture, get it right (to become of the right perspective), and not be blown away by the blizzard of public opinions. All through history, the Church brought forth its best and most brilliant theology during a crisis of ideas, and now is no different. Will we rise to the occasion and have proper discernment? 

So, what is the second sign of our times? The buzz word now echoing throughout the culture is “sustainability.” 

If you were to frequent a particular eatery that served a buffet style on a regular basis, you would notice if something was removed from the spread of delectable foods, would you not? Believe it or not some things have already vanished from the smorgasbord of churches because they were not sustainable, and one particular group  resided here in America when the colonies were organizing; however, it vanished before the signing of the Declaration of Independence.  Who might that be? That would be none other than the Puritans. They were not sustainable. (We’ll speak more about them in a later section.) 

I believe God— speaking through societal fads— is posing sustainability as a question, and this particular fad is always working its way through our society as a question rather than a statement. Farming practices are being questioned as to their sustainability. It shows up grocery labels, “From sustainable farming practices,” etc. Labor management and business methods are being scrutinized for their “sustainability.” This is a sign of our times. Perhaps God is asking the same thing of the smorgasbord of churches that grace our cities and towns. Is the smorgasbord sustainable? In order to answer that question, we must first find out what “sustainable” looks like. In the church world, what is sustainable and what is not? That is the question. The obvious answer to that is that which is sustainable is that which has always been here: the thing that is as it has always been will be what is here when the dust clears. This means that something that is sustainable has its roots in the past. If the thing that is sustainable is something ancient and very old, then we must look to the past to find it.

So, what is the purpose of this book? What is it that we wish to say? We wish to bring you the news; the “bad news and the good news.” What is the bad news? The bad news is that some forms of modern Christianity that appear on the smorgasbord of every community are not sustainable because they have been cut loose  or orphaned from the classical Christian root. They are orphaned in their faith because they have no connection with pre-Reformational Christianity. The good news is that many in orphaned expressions of Christianity are rediscovering their spiritual family history and attending to the old ways in order to walk in the well-trod ancient paths.