Showing posts with label Romance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Romance. Show all posts

Monday, June 3, 2013

Two Basic Modern Worldviews



Two Basic Modern Worldviews
(an excerpt from the book The Ikon of God)
vs.
What was the marvel of America sending men to the moon? What was the grandeur of that accomplishment? Was it that something wonderful would be found there, that maybe the moon was made of green cheese? When the first man, Neil Armstrong, stepped foot on the moon, how was this act  "One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind?" Nothing changed on earth: life was no different other than some brief excitement. If it was such a grand frontier, why have we not been back in over 40 years?
Let us put this into perspective. When Man finally got to the moon, he only found rocks and dust, rocks and dust made up of the same stuff as rocks and dust found on earth. How was this “small step” any kind of “one giant leap for mankind?” The real discoveries of putting a man on the moon had nothing to do with the moon itself, but had everything to do with what he saw when he got far enough away from earth to look back at it. The moon was inhospitably cold and hot, but the earth was the most brilliant thing in the cosmos, sparling, shinning, and full of life. Man’s travels to the moon did not result in any magnificent lunar discovery: we did not find plants that grew upside down, new elements to include on the periodic table, or even the smallest living cell. The true discovery came in what Man saw when looking back at earth. Undoubtedly, the most remarkable, most astounding discovery was not anything found on the moon but happened in the Apollo 8 mission, before Armstrong uttered those infamous words when stepping on the moon. When viewing earth from space the three astronauts of Apollo 8 had a message for earth, revealing what they saw:[i]
Bill Anders:
"We are now approaching lunar sunrise and, for all the people back on Earth, the crew of Apollo 8 has a message that we would like to send to you.
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.
And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
Jim Lovell:
"And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
Frank Borman:
"And God said, Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
And God called the dry land earth; and the gathering together of the waters called He seas: and God saw that it was good.
And from the crew of Apollo 8, we close with good night, good luck, a Merry Christmas – and God bless all of you, all of you on the good Earth."

What was the message for earth that the astronauts wanted to convey? What was it that they discovered by going into space? This message was nothing new, but something very old, as old as earth itself. It gave the only meaningful purpose to the Apollo missions. Earth was NOT an accident! Its existence was intentional. And if earth was intentional, then Somebody had to intend it and then create it; this gives meaning to everything. Intent demonstrates meaning; earth was intentional. But who intended it? That somebody, is God. And there is nothing that can compare with earth: it is the most wonderful place in the universe, nothing has been observed through any telescope or viewed from any space probe that can even remotely compares with earth. Like Dorothy, in the “Wizard of Oz,” at the finish of her long journey, who proclaimed, “There is no place like home.”
So if this truth was self-evident to the astronauts, why do so many disbelieve it? The advent of enlightened reason during the last few centuries has taken a terrible toll on the modern mind. The modern secularist sees the existence of everything as being some sort of enormous accident (how reasonable is that! Can you imagine a train wreck ending as beautiful as earth?!) The atheist’s bible reads something like this, “In the beginning there was nothing and nobody, then boom, something appeared quite accidentally, and that something without any intent, direction, or purpose from of anybody, again, accidentally became something well defined, and it, of its own accord, accidentally, produced grass and trees and birds…and then, quite accidentally, produced Man.” Making everything an accident is a very dim view of the universe indeed. It is like living on the moon: rocks on dust and dust on rocks. There are no animals, no trees, and even no color. Everything is lifeless,  just sitting there, and just existing with no real meaning or purpose.
This presents two very strikingly different points of view of the cosmos. One view is personal: that there is a Person who had intent and meaning for everything. Conversely, the other view denies any design or intent for the universe. With this view, nothing has any meaning, because it was all a series of accidents. When there is no meaning to the cosmos, then there is no meaning for the individual. To believe in this theory of accidents is to both believe in and live a life that is morbid and meaninglessness.
If there is a Creator, then there is intent, and if there is intent, then there is meaning, and that intent is the meaning of everything to us. To find meaning for life is to locate God’s original intent for creating everything. Life then becomes about the meaning; life is full of meaning and then everything has meaning. Every blue sky, every sunset, every flower, every bumble bee, has meaning. If there is a God and His intent was relational, then everything in Creation speaks, and even shouts, with the meaning of God’s intent. Everything created is God’s love letter. To lose sight of that is to lose the meaning of everything.
The secular worldview kills everything because there is no Creator and therefore no intent; with no intent, nothing has any meaning or value. Even life itself becomes disdainful, morose, purposeless, because it all was an accident; this is the culture of death. And as with all accidents, life becomes about the injury, the pain, the hurt. The cosmos injured us by producing us through an ongoing train wreck. By giving us life with no meaning, the cosmos has imprisoned us and made us victims. The modern obsession with being oppressed blatantly manifests this symptom of our much larger sickness. The secular worldview is a dungeon, with many tortures and devices of torment, because it strips the essence of every dignity God gave to Man from him.
In summary: there are two ways of seeing the universe. One, holds onto the dream of the Dreamer: it is full of meaning, full of life, full of wonder, and is based on miracles. The other is as lifeless as the moonscape: cold, dead, and without rhyme or reason. These are the your choices.  
Moses had it right:
See, I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil. (Deuteronomy 30:15)
The choice has always been and will always be the same, life or death.



[i] Apollo 8 Genesis Reading, Wikipedia.org, 01-08-2013, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_8_Genesis_reading

Scripture: The Ultimate Rorschach test



Scripture: the Ultimate Rorschach Test

(An excerpt from the book The Divinity Code)
Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; that he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, that he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church: for we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church. Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband. (Ephesians 5:22-33)
Starting a book on gender with these verses is very risky. Some readers may have already applied their assumptions and put it down. They are thinking, “Oh, I know where this discussion is going. I have heard that all before and I am tired of hearing it.” But, maybe you do not know where this book is going. So, if I may ask you a question? After reading these verses, what do you see? What stands out in your mind as the high points of this passage? Like a Rorschach Test,[1] what one sees in Scripture says more about the reader— particularly his heart toward God— than perhaps any psychological test.
Think about your favorite make and model car. Isn’t it beautiful? When thinking of it, what do you see? Do you see a conglomeration of nuts, bolts, grease, oil, metal, paint, cloth or do you see the finished car standing there, just waiting for an aggressive drive on a winding country road? Obviously, any pile of nuts, bolts, tires, steel, and engine parts could be just about any car, even the proverbial 1952 “Get Out and Push.” If you see only the mechanics (requirements) in these verses: “submit to your husband, love your wife, etc, etc,” you may be missing the whole point. Seeing only the “nuts and bolts” of marriage is like only seeing the nuts and bolts of the Ferrari (or was it a Corvette) that is pictured in your mind. Ok, let us put aside our preconceived ideas about what is here, step back and take another look.
Read the verses again. What do you see? Do you see the romance? Yes, these verses are about romance and not just any romance, but the romance upon which all other romances are based. It is the romance where heaven kisses earth. Yes, passion drives the universe, and it is behind the meaning of everything; there is no practical reason for the existence of anything without romance. A self-existent God does not need, neither does He desire, anything for purely practical reasons. We could ask (tongue in cheek) what do you give the God who already has everything? There is only one thing He wants: you. All of you. And not because you can fill some void, but because He is full of passion for human kind.
All commandments and all  rules are about forming the cosmic romance in the same way that nuts, bolts, tires, cloth (or leather), and electronics make up the Ferrari (or the Corvette). To focus on the constricting nature of nuts and bolts is to lose the greater picture of the end of all things: romance. On the other hand, to toss out any nuts and bolts of romance is to compromise the whole, in the same way removing the lug-nuts from the wheels cause the wheels to come off. No intelligent car owner despises the lug-nuts because they, in themselves, are not romantic, but he understands they contribute to the romantic experience (love affair) he has with his car, and for that he values them immensely.
The mystery of the universe is about experiencing God’s largess, His goodness, and His love, but that cannot happen unless we perceive it.  
The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light. But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness! (Matthew 6:22-23)
Here is where our hearts are revealed, this is the Rorschach Test: that if we only see the severity of the commandments in Scripture and think them restricting or laborious, we totally miss God’s heart and fall for Satan’s trap, as Eve had done! And we miss the whole point of God making a man and gifting him with a woman to marry in the first place. As the Scripture says, “if the eye is evil” (to look on disparagingly) then you have nothing but darkness. Commandment is not an end in itself, but a means to an end. Commandments are integral parts of a much bigger picture and that portrait is what nearly every classic western movie portrays: romance. All of God’s commandments are to preserve and facilitate all types of relationship, including romance. They are the components (nuts and bolts) that come together to structure a romantic relationship between Christ and His Church. To be clear, the commandments of God are holy because they issue from eternal realities in God and are in essence part of His very nature, but we must never separate God’s commandments from God’s heart. When you misjudge God’s motives, then you misjudge the meaning of God’s laws. God’s commandments are a part of the romance in the same way that the vows spoken at weddings— “forsaking all others”— allows for true romance to blossom. Law is the nuts and bolts of love because it preserves relationship.  
Where did this romance begin? In the Garden of Eden. With the staging of this divine romance—between God and Man— in the Garden of Eden, not everyone was happy about it. There was one, the quintessential anti-romantic, who seeks to destroy all romance by deconstructions of every kind. He is the killjoy, the spoilsport who seeks to wreck the story for all romantics. He disassembles the Ferrari and forces it into dysfunction and malfunction at every turn. As a culture, we are viewing all of the parts spread out over the garage floor, with no idea where to start putting it back together. Some are picking up a single piece of romance (sex) and they are pretending that it is the whole car. This only leaves emotional carnage, disappointment, and disgust.
Before getting into decoding gender— finding its meaning and origin— as we set out to do, let us first draw a picture of what is the state of things now, not from the close up point of view, there are many books that do that, but from the cosmic perspective.



[1] German psychologist Hermann Rorschach created a physiological test in 1921 whereby patients were diagnosed based on the patients’ descriptions of what they saw in random inkblots.